Federal judge dismisses claims against five Steamboat school employees in disabled students' abuse lawsuit; district still faces most of the case

The ruling came 10 days after the school board's agenda listed a possible closed-door session on a settlement demand.

Share
Excerpt of the first page of the Nov. 5, 2026 federal court order in the Steamboat Springs schools lawsuit, under the words: A federal judge narrows the case.
The first page of Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney's Nov. 5, 2026 order in the lawsuit against the Steamboat Springs School District RE-2, U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, No. 1:25-cv-00315. Graphic: Yampa Valley Independent.

Developing. This story will be updated with responses.

A federal judge on Thursday narrowed the lawsuit that four Routt County families filed over the alleged abuse of their children with disabilities at Steamboat Springs High School, dismissing the claims against five current and former school administrators and teachers and leaving the school district itself to face most of the case.

U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney ruled in a 25-page order that qualified immunity, which shields government employees from personal liability unless they violated a "clearly established" right, protects former Superintendent Celine Wicks, former interim high school principal Ron Peterson, former special education director Anne-Marie Tennyson and special education teachers Chuck Rosemond and Dan Juba from the constitutional claims brought against them personally.

The families' briefs, she wrote, did not explain how the cases they cited clearly established the rights at issue, though her ruling "isn't to say that Plaintiffs lacked (or possessed) a meritorious case."

The Steamboat Springs School District RE-2 asked the judge to dismiss only two of the nine claims against it and has answered the other seven, including disability discrimination claims under Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act. One race-discrimination claim also continues against former paraprofessional Sylvia Rawlings, who the complaint says called a Black student a "monkey"; the judge found those allegations, accepted as true at this stage, describe a clearly established equal protection violation.

Grid of seven defendants against seven groups of claims after the Nov. 5 order. The school district: claims 1-7 (disability law, Fourth Amendment, due process, equal protection, Title VI) continue; claims 8 and 9 (Sections 1981 and 1986) dismissed. Celine Wicks and Ron Peterson: claims 3-6, 8 and 9 dismissed; claims 1-2 and 7, pleaded against them only in their official roles, not expressly addressed. Anne-Marie Tennyson: all nine dismissed. Chuck Rosemond and Dan Juba: claims 3-6 dismissed; claims 1-2 not expressly addressed; not named in claims 7-9. Sylvia Rawlings: claim 6 (equal protection) continues; claims 1-5, 7 and 8 dismissed; not named in claim 9. The order does not say whether the dismissals are with or without prejudice.
Each box is one defendant and one group of claims from the families' amended complaint, after the Nov. 5 order. "Not expressly addressed": claims pleaded against these employees only in their official roles, which courts treat as claims against the district. Source: the order (ECF 90), the amended complaint (ECF 71), the district's answer (ECF 76) and motion (ECF 78). Graphic: Yampa Valley Independent.

The order does not expressly address the two disability-law claims that name the four district employees, or the Title VI claim that names Wicks and Peterson, in their official roles; courts treat such claims as claims against the district itself. The Independent is asking the parties whether the four remain in the case.

The ruling came 10 days after a special meeting of the RE-2 board whose agenda listed a possible closed-door session on "a settlement demand" in the case, at a meeting the agenda said was "open to the public but will not be livestreamed for future viewing." Whether the session took place is not yet public; no minutes have been posted. Colorado's open meetings law bars adopting any "position" or "formal action" in a closed session.

The lawsuit, filed in January 2025 and amended this February, says the four students, all nonverbal, were denied bathroom help, left in soiled clothing, restrained and, in one case, spun in a wheelchair until it overturned. The district denies most of the allegations. It admits that Rawlings "pushed [the student's] wheelchair while playing a game and that the wheelchair accidentally tipped over" in January 2023, and that it would not have investigated without a parent's demand the next day; it says Rawlings told her supervising teacher and the principal "immediately reported the incident" to the school resource officer. The district denies the "monkey" allegation and says the principal investigated reports of the comments. Rawlings resigned days later and, the complaint says, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor count of crimes against an at-risk person.

Timeline of the Steamboat schools lawsuit, from the complaint's account and the court docket. Jan. 31, 2023: wheelchair incident in the high school gym (the district admits the chair accidentally tipped over). Feb. 3, 2023: paraprofessional Sylvia Rawlings resigns. May 22, 2023: Rawlings pleads guilty to a misdemeanor; Steamboat Radio reported 18 months' probation. Sept. 26, 2023: families file a state complaint with the Colorado Department of Education. Jan. 29, 2025: lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court against the district and six employees. May 23, 2025: case paused for mediation. Aug. 14, 2025: stay lifted after mediation produces no settlement. Oct. 15, 2025: discovery put on hold. Feb. 11, 2026: families file a narrower amended complaint with nine claims. Feb. 25, 2026: district answers; three motions to dismiss. Oct. 26, 2026: school board agenda lists a possible closed session on a settlement demand. Nov. 5, 2026: judge dismisses constitutional claims against five employees; district still faces seven of nine claims.
Dates before the lawsuit come from the families' complaint and, where noted, the district's answer; the complaint's allegations are unproven. Source: ECF 71, ECF 76, the court docket, the RE-2 Oct. 26 agenda and Steamboat Radio (May 22, 2023). Graphic: Yampa Valley Independent.

When the suit drew attention in September 2025, then-Superintendent Wicks said in a statement to the Steamboat Pilot & Today that the district did "not agree with many of the allegations and characterizations" and had made "significant leadership and system-wide changes."

The Independent asked the district, the families' attorneys and lawyers for the individual defendants for comment at 7:47 a.m. Friday and will update this story with their responses.

What's next: discovery was put on hold in October 2025 while earlier immunity motions were pending; the docket shows no scheduling order or trial date. The board's next meeting had not been posted as of Friday morning.